'Citizen participation' includes various participatory techniques and is frequently viewed as an unproblematic and important social good when used as part of the regulation of the innovation and implementation of science and technology. This is perhaps especially evident in debates around 'anticipatory governance' or 'upstream engagement'. Here, we interrogate this thesis using the example of the European Union's regulation of emerging health technologies (such as nanotechnology). In this case, citizen participation in regulatory debate is concerned with innovative objects for medical application that are considered to be emergent or not yet concrete. Through synthesising insights from law, regulatory studies, critical theory, and science and technology studies, we seek to cast new light on the promises, paradoxes, and pitfalls of citizen participation as a tool or technology of regulation in itself. As such we aim to generate a new vantage point from which to view the values and sociotechnical imaginaries that are both 'designed-in' and 'designed-out' of citizen participation. In so doing, we show not only how publics (do not) regulate technologies, but also how citizens themselves are regulated through the techniques of participation.

译文

:“公民参与”包括各种参与性技术,在用作科学技术创新和实施的一部分时,通常被认为是毫无问题且重要的社会公益。在有关“预期治理”或“上游参与”的辩论中,这一点尤其明显。在这里,我们以欧洲联盟对新兴卫生技术(例如纳米技术)的监管为例,对本论文进行审讯。在这种情况下,公民参与监管辩论与医疗应用的创新对象有关,这些对象被认为是新兴的或尚未具体的。通过综合来自法律,监管研究,批判理论以及科学和技术研究的见解,我们寻求对公民参与作为其自身的工具或技术的承诺,悖论和陷阱进行新的阐释。因此,我们旨在产生一个新的视角,从中可以查看“参与式”设计和“参与式”设计的公民参与的价值观和社会技术想象力。通过这样做,我们不仅展示了公众如何(不)规范技术,而且还展示了如何通过参与技术来规范公民自身。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录