In this article, the authors use the context of childbirth to consider the power that is endemic in certain forms of evidence within maternity care research. First, there is consideration of how the current evidence hierarchy and experimental-based studies are the gold standard to determine and direct women's maternity experiences, although this can be at the detriment of care and irrespective of women's needs. This is followed by a critique of how the predominant means to assess women's experiences via satisfaction surveys is of limited utility, offering impartial and restricted insights to assess the quality of care provision. A counter position of hermeneutic phenomenology as research method is then described. This approach offers an alternative perspective by penetrating the taken-for-granted ordinariness of an event (such as childbirth) to elicit rich emic meanings. Whilst all approaches to understanding maternity care have a place, depending on the question(s) being asked, the contribution of phenomenology is how it can uncover a depth of contextual understanding into what matters to women and to inform and transform care delivery.

译文

在本文中,作者使用分娩的背景来考虑产妇护理研究中某些形式的证据中特有的力量。首先,考虑当前的证据等级和基于实验的研究如何成为确定和指导妇女产妇经历的金标准,尽管这可能不利于护理,也不考虑妇女的需求。随后是对通过满意度调查评估妇女经历的主要手段如何效用有限的批评,它提供了公正和有限的见解来评估护理质量。然后描述了诠释学现象学作为研究方法的相反位置。这种方法通过渗透事件 (例如分娩) 的准予性来激发丰富的意义,从而提供了另一种观点。尽管所有了解产妇护理的方法都有一席之地,但取决于所提出的问题,现象学的贡献在于它如何揭示对妇女重要的背景理解的深度,并告知和改变护理的交付。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录