Current approaches to assessing agrammatism use data from restricted contexts, such as picture description and story telling tasks. There is evidence in the conversation analysis literature to suggest that conversational grammar may differ markedly from the grammar of such elicited language samples. The disparity between conversational and test grammar suggests that it is possible for the form of an agrammatic utterance to be motivated by the context in which it occurs. Thus, behaviours previously considered to be symptoms of agrammatism may be adaptations to talking in different environments. This study analyses two distinctive test response forms made by two agrammatic speakers, and discusses whether they might be strategic adaptations to testing rather than symptoms of impairment.

译文

:目前评估语法的方法使用来自受限上下文的数据,例如图片描述和讲故事的任务。会话分析文献中有证据表明,会话语法可能与此类语言样本的语法明显不同。会话语法和测试语法之间的差异表明,语法发声的形式有可能受到其发生的上下文的激励。因此,以前被认为是语法特征的行为可能是适应不同环境中的谈话。这项研究分析了两位讲语法的人做出的两种独特的测试反应形式,并讨论了它们是否可能是对测试的战略适应,而不是障碍的症状。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录