" />

A letter to the editor of the journal, Contraception, concerns an article previously published in that journal entitled "WHO study of the Progesterone IUD," and indicts that article as having ignored standards for scientific reporting of prospective trials of contraceptives. The authors of the complaining letter have attempted to reach the authors of the progsterone IUD paper, but have received no response to their questions; in this article, only a corrigendum from WHO disavowing any knowledge or authorization of the disputed paper constitutes the reply. Objections to the IUD study, which had been published in volume 19, number 6, June 1979, p. 575-589, include discrepancies with study dates, incompleteness of data, improper statistical conclusions of significance, errors in menstruation data, problems with computation of medians, and improper conclusions from existing data. The complainants conclude, "it appears that the contradictions and inaccuracies in the report, as well as the substantial incompleteness of the data being reported, prevent this report from being a scientific document of the material under study."

译文

给《避孕》杂志编辑的一封信涉及先前在该杂志上发表的一篇题​​为“世界卫生组织对孕激素宫内节育器的研究”的文章,并指出该文章忽略了对避孕药的前瞻性试验进行科学报告的标准。投诉信的作者曾试图联系Progsterone IUD论文的作者,但未收到任何答复。在本文中,只有来自WHO的更正,而不是对有争议的文件有任何了解或授权,才构成答复。对宫内节育器研究的异议,已于1979年6月在第19卷第6期上发表。 575-589,包括研究日期的差异,数据的不完整,显着性的统计结论不正确,月经数据有误,中位数的计算问题以及现有数据的不正确结论。投诉人总结说:“报告中的矛盾和不正确之处,以及所报告数据的严重不完整,使该报告无法成为所研究材料的科学文件。”

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录