We assessed age differences in interference effects in priming by using fragment completion. In Experiment 1, noninterfering filler words preceded critical targets at study, and priming was age invariant. In Experiment 2, the same target items had interfering competitors at the beginning of the list, such that both the target and the competitor were legitimate solutions to a fragment. Having two responses to a cue was disruptive for older adults, but not for younger adults. Younger and older adults differ in their susceptibility to interference in implicit tasks, and interference may play a role in influencing the magnitude of age differences in priming.

译文

:我们使用片段完成方法评估了引发作用中干扰作用的年龄差异。在实验1中,在研究中,关键词之前没有干扰的填充词,并且启动词是年龄不变的。在实验2中,相同的目标项目在列表的开头具有干扰的竞争者,因此目标和竞争者都是碎片的合法解决方案。对提示有两种反应会对老年人造成破坏,但对年轻人则没有影响。年轻人和老年人在隐性任务中对干扰的敏感性不同,并且干扰可能会影响启动时年龄差异的大小。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录