Consent must be undertaken prior to any dermatological procedure; however, in doing this, the clinician needs to ensure consent is valid and satisfies the principles of determining material risk. We aimed to assess variations in obtaining consent in the UK and understanding of material risk through a nationally distributed survey to members of the British Society for Dermatological Surgery and British Association of Dermatologists. Of 165 responses, we found that written consent was being obtained for all procedures in 73.9% of cases and typically at the time of procedure in the operating room/theatre (78.8%). Fifty-seven per cent of respondents were not familiar with the term 'material risk' and almost one-third were not aware of the Montgomery vs. Lanarkshire ruling, which replaced the Bolam test in 2015. We would encourage readers to be aware of these changes to consent law in the UK and how it might affect their approach to obtaining consent.

译文

:必须在任何皮肤病学程序之前进行同意;但是,这样做时,临床医生需要确保同意有效并满足确定重大风险的原则。我们旨在通过对英国皮肤病外科学会和英国皮肤科医生协会成员进行的全国性调查来评估在英国获得同意和对重大风险的理解的差异。在165份答复中,我们发现73.9%的病例(通常是在手术室/手术室中)在所有手术中均获得了书面同意(78.8%)。 57%的受访者对“重大风险”一词不熟悉,几乎三分之一的受访者不了解蒙哥马利诉拉纳克郡裁定,该裁定在2015年取代了博拉姆测验。我们鼓励读者注意这些规定。英国同意书法律的变更及其可能如何影响他们获取同意书的方式。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录